The Honorable Art Rocque, Jr Commissioner Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Office of Adjudications 79 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106 Dear Mr. Commissioner: I am writing in support of an appeal, submitted by Islander East, L.L.C. in the form of a request for a Declaratory Ruling, to the Department of Environmental Protection to overturn the recent decision by the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to deny a Section 401 Water Quality permit to Islander East. I believe the Islander East natural gas pipeline proposal holds many benefits for the people of Connecticut and New York including cleaner air, greater economic growth and a new source of energy for our region. For over two years, the Islander East Pipeline Company has been applying for permits to build a 49.9-mile, 24-inch natural gas pipeline from North Haven, Connecticut to Long Island. The gas line will bring fuel to approximately 600,000 homes and is also expected to be used to fuel a new generation of power plants. The New York State Department of State recently issued its approval of Islander East's project, stating that it is "consistent" with the State's coastal zone management program, and that "further review...is not required." On May 6th, 2004 the U.S. Department of Commerce approved the Islander East pipeline proposal and "concluded that the impact to shellfish habitat will be temporary in nature and limited in scope". The new pipeline is crucial to future economic development on Long Island because growth in natural gas demand on the Island has been outpacing growth in supply for years. And while Long Island currently receives most of its natural gas from the American Southwest and Western Canada, the new pipeline would provide Long Island with gas from Eastern Canada for the first time. I agree with Senator Hillary Clinton when she states "With respect to environmental concerns, Islander East will employ horizontal direct drilling (HDD) technology that minimizes the need to dig a trench in portions of the pipeline route. This HDD technology - which will be used for the maximum feasible distance of approximately 4,000 feet out from the Connecticut shoreline - allows Islander East to dig a single hole and tunnel underground horizontally, thereby minimizing environmental impacts. This technology has been praised by well-regarded environmental conservation organizations for helping to significantly reduce the pipeline's impact on core preservation areas." I understand that the pipeline will be placed beneath the ocean floor, causing a minimum disturbance to near-shore shellfish beds and other environmentally sensitive areas. Construction activity will take place during winter months, when fish and shellfish are less active and less susceptible to disturbance. I respectfully request that the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection consider the appeal by Islander East and make a judgement in favor of their pipeline proposal. Sincerely,